Amit Shah hints at revoking AFSPA in Jammu and Kashmir in an interview on March 26. This statement comes amidst mounting demands from various quarters, both in J&K and the northeastern states, urging the revocation of AFSPA.
In a significant move, Union Home Minister Amit Shah has signaled the government’s willingness to reconsider the continuation of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in Jammu and Kashmir.
Mr. Shah emphasized the government’s commitment to restoring normalcy in the region by entrusting law and order responsibilities primarily to the Jammu and Kashmir Police. This marks a notable shift, reflecting increased trust in the local law enforcement agencies to manage security affairs effectively.
Highlighting the evolving security landscape, Mr. Shah pointed out the considerable progress made in the northeastern states, where AFSPA has been lifted in 70% of the areas. This suggests a broader strategy aimed at tailoring security measures to the specific needs of each region, rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach.
The potential revocation of AFSPA holds significant implications for the residents of Jammu and Kashmir, who have long grappled with the presence of armed forces and the accompanying powers granted under the act. It signifies a step towards empowering local institutions and fostering a sense of ownership over security matters among the populace
Looking ahead, Mr. Shah affirmed the government’s commitment to democratic principles by announcing plans for Assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir before September. This aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of inclusive governance, where democracy extends beyond the confines of a select few families.
Opposition Leader’s reaction on Amit Shah’s remark
However, amidst expressions of optimism regarding the possible removal of AFSPA, cautionary voices have emerged. Mehbooba Mufti, Chief of the People’s Democratic Party, underscored the importance of concrete actions beyond mere assurances. She urged for tangible steps such as the release of detainees and journalists, highlighting the need for substantive progress on the ground.
As the discourse surrounding AFSPA continues to evolve, Mr. Shah’s statement signals a potential turning point in the security dynamics of Jammu and Kashmir. It opens the door for dialogue and deliberation on the appropriate measures needed to address security challenges while upholding democratic values and respecting the aspirations of the region’s residents.
Full Interview
The full interview is available on JK channel.
What is AFSPA Act?
The Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act (AFSPA), enacted in 1990, empowers armed forces personnel with special powers in disturbed areas of Jammu and Kashmir. These powers include the authority to use force, conduct searches and arrests without warrants, and seize property. The act is invoked when the Governor or Central Government deems an area to be in a disturbed and dangerous condition, necessitating the use of armed forces to maintain public order and prevent activities such as terrorist acts and threats to India’s sovereignty.
Under AFSPA, armed forces personnel can use force, including lethal force, against individuals contravening laws or orders in the disturbed area. They can also destroy structures used for armed attacks or training camps, and arrest suspects without warrants. Additionally, they have the power to stop, search, and seize vehicles or vessels suspected of carrying offenders or illegal arms.
The act provides immunity from prosecution for actions taken in good faith under its provisions, with legal proceedings requiring prior sanction from the Central Government. The AFSPA was repealed and replaced an earlier ordinance with similar provisions, and actions taken under the repealed ordinance are deemed to have been done under the act.
AFSPA has been a subject of controversy, with critics raising concerns about human rights violations and excessive use of force by armed forces personnel. Calls for its repeal have come from various quarters, including civil society organizations and political leaders, citing the need to restore civilian authority and address grievances in conflict-affected areas.